Hey, um “what seen in shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child” most likely means BV never saw anything, nothing devious was going on he just THOUGHT he saw something
@user-nm1lx8qb3u but then why would that be a misunderstanding? A springlock failure is literally someone being skewered alive, not much of a misunderstanding
Actually that line refers to how BV witnessed Elizabeth get killed by Circus Baby. Thats why Nightmare and Nightmare Fredbear have teeth on their stomachs, like mouths. The stomach is where Circus baby's claw comes out of. So in his eyes, as a child, it looks like the animatronic ate his sister. Mystery solved?
@bonD6002 ok but that's not much of a "misunderstanding" but something that could be used for the stomach mouths is we literally see an employee half inside a suit, to a little kid who is misunderstanding things that could look like the suit has a stomach at the torso and ate the man's legs
In a way, even William ended up a victim to Fazbear Entertainment just like their employees, having their deaths covered up and hidden away. After Willaim was springlocked, he was discovered in the saferoom and they sealed it with his body in it. Not just in that location, but in almost every other location to avoid suspicion. It shows how experienced they are with hiding incidents to keep their business going, like with the "missing" nightguards. Fazbear Entertainment was the one to discover him, because in Fnaf 2, phone guy tells us in a startled tone, "The yellow one, someone used it", implying that they found William springlocked in the suit. They then left him there to be forgotten when they abandoned the building with the dismantled fnaf 1 animatronics. What's even more bizarre is that when he was rediscovered 30 years later, they intended to use the suit containing his corpse as the main attraction. Exploiting a dead guy for profit. The company is literally worthy of it's own netflix documentary, they are true villains. There's also lots of things and loopholes in the lore that dont make sense because Scott said he didnt expect people to beat the game. He said fnaf 1 was meant to be unbeatable, which means he hadn't planned the lore that far ahead, so the "odor" comment was most likely a joke that he ended up continuing throughout the games, and had no lore implication to Michael. Or the odor could also just be coming from the animatronics themselves, as people complained about the smell since they were stuffed with bodies and never cleaned.
I think they knew he used it to kill someone, but not that it was him. In the dismantling mini games in 3, it’s obvious the building is run down & no longer in use
I don't think he got sprintrapped during fnaf2, but he definitively committed murders there and used the suit. The company didn't cover the murders up well enough because they're investigated and shut down. We see it in the Save Them minigame.
I think all of the questions you had about Freddy Fazbear's Pizza 1993 can be answered like you said: Phone Guy's full of shit. Fazbear Entertainment is full of shit. They don't care for their employees or customers as much as they should. They only care for those fat stacks 💰 and are more than willing to lie, manipulate, and perform various cover ups just to stay in business as long as possible. And the longer they stay open, the worse they get. Help Wanted (both the game and the story in Tales from the Pizzaplex) show them at their absolute lowest.
@@bonswootch I always pegged Henry as someone who had genuine love and passion for his restaurant, Fredbear's. Maybe the Bite of '83 forced him to close his doors and get bought out by FE? Then again, who knows how long that lasted if it did happen considering it's implied he disappeared after losing Charlie. Nice video, btw. The analysis of Phone Guy's recordings and calls is what I've gotten interested in as well in trying to figure the restaurants in Fruity Maze and Midnight Motorist.
@@Takejiro24My theory/HC is that Henry was charged for Charlie’s murder. That would explain why the newspapers in fnaf one say that there was someone who was caught. Henry would have had his stake confiscated and given to William, who could then attempt to cover up the MCI and appoint incompetent employees before selling his stake and being able to afford the SL bunker.
@@Anonyomus_commenter I think william was the owner and after killing Charlie was charged and found guilty and ownership would later go to henry but william was later let out due to lack of evidence or something like that
The thing which confuses me the most recently is the existence of the costumes in mimic chase sequence in ruin. I don’t know what the purpose of it’s existence and revelance is but maybe a good idea to look into? Maybe they might be the odd-looking costumes revealed from Phone Dude in Fnaf 3? Thanks for another great video! Can’t wait for more!
Thanks! Glad to hear that :) I’ve also been thinking about the importance of the temporary costumes from FNAF 3. It could just be filler dialogue or it could be important. As of right now, I don’t see what it means for the lore if anything, but perhaps something will dawn on me :)
@@curioustinman3348 I read that. I just have a hard time connecting those two things because they take place almost 50 years apart. I suppose it’s possible that those were the suits used in FNAF 3’s cassettes, but does that really solve anything? It still leaves the question of why/is it relevant that the temporary costumes weren’t appropriate back at the first restaurant. And why explain that now? There’s been like 7 games in between and that detail from FNAF 3 seems pretty minor for them to explain it in the latest game. That’s just my take on it.
@@bonswootchI don't think it's supposed to "solve" anything. I think after pizza sim, Scott has added lore through callbacks to jokes & offhanded comments to be made into lore for future stories.
11:38 ish: "... that the Spring Bonnie costume has been noticeably moved." Meanwhile, Spring Trap is just standing there. The timing on that got a chuckle out of me.
26:23 “Tampering” might just be Michael trying to free the souls from their animatronic jails. Dismantling them, burning them, etc Which doesn’t require mechanical expertise, but Michael has grown up around William who was obsessed with robots… among other things
Phone Guy said "Technician' singular, rather then the plural which you said. when talking about the animatronics being looked at, so there was likely only IONE technician, not multiple. I know it's just a small detail, but still.
Also, something I didn't mention, how did KIDS take Mangle apart... that makes no sense unless they have super strength or something, Like Mangle is an animatronic made of hard metals... Yes, I know it has been days, but still I thought this was important enough ro come back here.
33:10 I think, even at the time fnaf 1 was released, this was supposed to be a lie. It was already clear the place was haunted by children when fnaf 1 came out. The posters of the animatronics occasionally change to drawings of crying children, the newspapers talk about children going missing, and blood leaking out of the animatronics. There is no rule about endo-skeletons being out of their suit, that’s a lie to coverup the hauntings.
34:09 my theory is that in the dark, the animatronics cannot see very well, so their sight is likely movement based, and due to the fact that the parts and service room is pretty dark, as well as the fact that the endo skeleton doesn’t move at all means that the animatronics don’t recognize it as a endo skeleton
17:20 phone guy mentions that the withered animatronics are being used for parts, but the toy animatronics don’t have that many parts and are thus only partially possessed and act closer to their programming
One thing I realized about phone guys death is he was asking us to find him “I always wandered what was in those empty heads. Back there, do me a favor and check inside them for me” “I’m going to try and hold out” He was going to try and stay alive and wait for us to find him, we didn’t find him 😢
For the toys that’s not entirely true The withered were being used as spare parts so it’s possible agony was transferred over to the toys and corrupted there programming Also fnaf 2’s are likely akso pre recording since the gameplay takes place in November and that autumn/spring depending on the hemisphere
That makes sense. The spare parts could definitely have influenced the Toy Animatronics. As for the recording date.. it’s very strange to me. The restaurant was only open for a few short weeks, but the recordings seem to take place months prior and reference the new toy animatronics. As of right now I don’t have a solid explanation for that. Definitely something to consider in another video :)
cool video! really like the production value and this kind of analysis/compilation of info from the first four games is nice to have 😼as for 26:40, i interpreted 'family pizzeria' as it being more of a pizzeria *for* families to eat and not a family-run/owned restaurant (assuming that's what you interpreted it to mean)
Videos like these make me very happy we're still theorizing FNAF and discussing history. Even though I know (especially for the first game) Scott just made a creepy Showbiz-Chuck E Cheese style horror game with meaningless lore that he then ran with it because the game got so popular, I still love thinking about the REAL story about what was going on
Neat video! Here are my thoughts as I watched: 16:57 Something to note is that they used the Withereds, which were already haunted, for parts, suggesting that those parts were used in the Toys, which might mean that the MCI kids are also possessing the Toys through those shared parts. Alternatively, the SAVE THEM kids might be involved. 19:15 You just said that the Toys aren't possessed. Make up your mind. 19:34 Since they have a Parts and Service room full of spare parts, not to mention the Withereds, they probably put in some spare parts to enhance the "attraction". 20:48 Plus, it doesn't have a facial recognition system like the others, or at least isn't really said to. If we take FNaF 5 into account, its circuitry might be almost totally fried and thus give the spirit within nearly full control. 22:31 Very much haunted behavior. 26:27 Alternatively, he smells _because_ he was tampering with the smelly Withereds. 34:05 Those teeth are the player's, as suggested when Phone Guy mentioned them popping out the front of the mask. 37:08 This matches their Help Wanted behavior (despite it probably being new management), though it's also possible that tampering with the smelly animatronics also leaves you stinky.
Hey thanks! I’m glad you liked it. 16:57 That’s a good point, perhaps some of the possessed parts made their way into the Toy’s. As for the SAVE THEM kids, that is what I was leaning towards in this video, however, it could certainly be either. 19:15 What I meant was that they weren’t possessed at the start of the game, but perhaps they became possessed as the days go on, thus the building being on lockdown and the animatronics behavior changing. I apologize if I didn’t make that evident. 19:34 I suppose that is possible.. if that is the case it makes me questions Fazbear Entertainment’s choices even more-one of their characters has extra skeletal parts.. creepy. 20:48 Sounds good to me. As the “Security Puppet” it’s funny they never worked any of the newer upgrades into it. Then again, it was likely an older character and now resides inside of a box. 22:31 Maybe.. but Phone Guy emphasizes their strange behavior and that someone might have tampered with their facial recognition systems. 26:27 Perhaps. That would make these seemingly two pieces of evidence really just one. As if we don’t have enough information already! xD 34:05 That’s very possible.. even though he said that I just didn’t think they looked anything like human teeth, but it’s possible that is what is shown. So maybe there is maybe there isn’t an endo skeleton in there too. Even if that isn’t the case, that was just a small theory and shouldn’t take away from the rest of the narrative. 37:08 I threw that in there because I’ve heard people say that but I don’t believe they just made up “odor”. I do believe that Scott put that in there for one reason or another; whether it be to show that he’s a corpse or to further emphasize what’s he’s been doing with the animatronics. Or.. it could’ve been a joke in the first game that Scott turned into a running gag in the prequel.. Not sure :) Thanks again for your comments, I’m glad to hear feedback and discuss theories!
@@bonswootch Thank you for responding and clarifying some points, that is very helpful. One thing about the teeth is that Scott is notoriously bad at modeling humans, and the game over screen just needed to get across the idea that "hey, your face is DESTROYED inside of this thing", so vaguely human and less-rectangular teeth were good enough.
I think the coverup and investigation for the original Missing Children Incident lasted 4 years, from 83 to 87. That includes the investigation of Charlie's death. FNAF2 is when Purple Guy was finally identified as the one that "used the yellow suit". He was obviously the dayshift guard who was terminated. But while the investigation was going on for 4 years, Fazbear Entertainment took measures to reassure the patrons that it was safe. That's when they upgraded the animatronics with links to a criminal database, etc. It's unclear if all 5 disappearances happened at the same time and I don't think it makes any difference. I imagine Purple Guy spread out his crimes as to avoid suspicion. His first crime, however, was shown in Take Cake, and gave birth to the possessed Puppet. The details of this are unclear. Was it a hit and run? Did he stab her? Was it even "The" Purple Guy or some other Purple Guy? UCN's Puppet says something curious about how she's not mad at the player. If we play as the killer in UCN, and this killer killed Charlie intentionally, why would she "forgive" him like that? It's very fishy. If the UCN player killed Charlie, it was an accident. If the UCN player didn't kill Charlie, then who did? I have to wonder sometimes about the Security Puppet minigame. The skid marks in the road suggest someone either braked quickly or accelerated quickly. And it was raining and dark and in an alleyway. What if someone simply ran into her then fled the scene? This would explain why Charlie was able to remain self-aware as a spirit. She didn't die some gruesome prolonged death, she died suddenly in an accident. This also explains Henry's choice of words when talking to William at the end of FFPS. He still calls him "old friend" but curiously doesn't accuse William of killing his daughter. I really think there is some huge misconception. If the serial killer responsible for the MCI also killed Charlie, her death was an accident. That's why Puppet's not mad at him anymore. That's why she recognizes him but isn't afraid of him anymore. And I'm inclined to say it had to be the MCI killer, because of Toy Chica's High School Years montage. She starts off already having a body part in her bag and I believe this is in reference to Charlie's death being the killer's first kill, albeit an unintentional one. It's curious that Toy Chica doesn't explain that first kill, don't you think?
@@bonswootch I have a theory that Fritz Smith is Phone Guy and that he was one of the first people to work for Fazbear Entertainment and he is killed by the animatronics when Afton decides that Fritz knows too much about what is going on
10:09 -Charlie is an unreliable narrator though. Henry made sure she did not know she was not the original Charlie and gave her and artificial memories. She believed her brother was the one snatched and was less questioning on her father's odd intentions. She just dismisses the closets and even refers to one as the door for the little doll that actually is her conscious self. She also does not remember or know aspects of certain bots and the restaurant. Henry programmed her memories and knowledge to numb her inhibitions on the shadier aspects of his inventions. She may just think or remember him as dismantling anything dangerous because that falls in line with what he wanted her to think. We know this isn't even truly the case as he not only made a bot to kill himself but left the Baby bot functional yet unfinished. He told his sister to destroy the current Charlie but just ran off to die himself. This brings up the other aspect. The Henry form the games is much more a protagonist from what we saw but Henry in the books, while not a strait up villain, is not the same good guy. He clearly has less steadfast morality than his counterpart. Sure the trauma of losing his child leads to mental illness that can be used to explain some of it but there are hints he had to be off format he start and only sank further as a result. A lot of the tech he was working on and behavior like his lack of proper supervision over Charlie lead us to believe he was not the most responsible guy. part of a huge difference is that he was the one to make Charlie how she is in the book while the puppet Charlie in the games was an accident. Book Henry specifically went into insane Frankenstein inventor trying to make new vessels for his daughter to sort of live in and became obsessed. It inferedly drive away his wife and the one kid he still had a live. Henry in the books is fixed on making things over the things he has. He only really gets so bent on bringing Charlie back because she was now a project. He realized eventually how wrong that is and how she should never have been entwined into the toxic part of his life to form an abomination. That's why he decided to kill himself. When invested in his work, book Henry absolutely seems the kind of guy who may allow dangerous inventions to be used as a stepping stone to something greater. Why dismantle and start from scratch the. You can test, implement and rework for better and better versions?
Oh wow I didn’t ever think about the “we’re moving you to the day shift” being because they were worried Afton was swiping kids. That makes sense though!
I have a thought on why Mangle's second head and hand are there in its model. The staff had extra parts leftover from the Original Funtime Foxy, and just decided to throw them there just for the heck of it when no one was looking. I have no evidence to back this up, but I personally have this as a sort of small headcanon of mine.
19:36 my theory is that one of the children went into the parts and service or somewhere and grabbed some extra parts, thus explaining the fact that mangle has 2 heads and 2 right hands
Gotta love these evil game companies! 😄 There's no way they didn't notice the bodies in the old suits during the remodels, or William in the springtrap suit before they walled him up. I have a feeling Phone Guy gets massive bonuses for hush money. Fnaf 2 being a "grand re-opening" of a "vintage restaurant" and the phone guy's dialogue suggests it's an older location that's being re-opened. The "kid friendly" upgrades are the new AI and the ability to move around on their own so they can protect children. That explains Mangle (and the Mangle toy in fnaf4). Since parts of the withered animations were used to repair the toys, I don't think they were ever individually possessed. After the shut down the toys are scrapped and used to repair the withered. "What's going on out there" is missing kids, and it's being connected to the restaurant because the kids spent time there. William definitively murdered there because we're in the fnaf2 location in Save Them, where the Puppet activates Freddie to "save them" while the others are still dormant. The company must not have covered the blood bath up well enough since they're being investigated and eventually shut down. In fnaf2 Phone Guy says it isn't possible for the old animatronics to move around on their own, so that was a new thing with the toys. Either they assume the remodel after fnaf2 gave the old models that ability, or the company knows they're haunted by now and are trying to hush that up too. I think it's the latter because phone guy is clearly lying to us in fnaf1. And if there's a Fredbear plush, why couldn't there be a Spring Bonnie? They might just be older than the current toy line, and any toy with a mechanic could be a finger trap.
1:49 I doubt since it was included in that joke leak from scott during ucn’s developed it where it was next to 2 theories that were famously never true (Foxy is a good guy & Phone guy is the killer). Although to be quite honest I miss when the story was flexible enough that out there theories like dream theory could work. I had a couple of my own back when that I doubt hold up anymore (although modern fnaf is too dense for me to check them).
Let's be honest here, Fazbear Entertainment cares more about profit than they do about employee safety, customer safety, OSHA guidelines and FDA regulations (this isn't too much of a surprise since the fictional company is set in America. There's a very good reason why most American food is illegal in other parts of the world). Though the books are in a separate universe (a parallel one, where everything is mostly the same, or is an equivalent of that thing, that's in the main games), they do help us to see how this company operates. One story that stuck out to me was called 'Pizza Kit'. While not having a whole lot of lore, the premise is a disturbing one. Someone falls into a pizza sauce vat, and instead of telling someone about it and stopping production, Fazbear Entertainment just continues on with making pizzas, knowing full well that they have human...uh... remains in them. Like, wth. Another story (a classic in my opinion) is 'Fetch'. This one has more lore relevance. Fetch is described as looking older than the protagonist's parents (when modern tech didn't exist) yet is able to connect with modern smartphone technology. This kind of implies that Fazbear Entertainment has more advanced tech than the rest of the world does, in this universe. Which does explain why the tech does seem a little strange to us as people playing the games. We always thought "Wow, this is super high tech and sci-fi". Yes, it was. But it doesn't reflect the technological advancements made by everyone else in this world. We have no indicator on where the rest of the Freddy's world is in terms of industrial advancement.
Technically no one was killed by the vat. Or atleast, the MCs friend wasn't. Fetch is also possessed/infected with agony. So it was probably normal when built.
@@daneiltherat2327 I’m pretty sure the fact that Fetch can connect to phones has nothing to do with remnant or agony. The tech existed already, before any kind of possession happened.
I have an answer for the bite of 83 simple that since fredbear has a bigger jaw then most the anmatronics as seen in fnaf 4 it possible that a more powerful part was used to move his jaw but under pressure of Evans head lead to him getting hurt from the buildup of pressure
The Finger trap spring bonnie hand puppet could just be an old toy so those characters could have be around in one form or another for long time even compared to the events of 4
I could see Phone Guy using the 20 year time as just a ballpark number, since he had been in the company so long, and was kind of rambling. Just overestimating, how long it had been. Especially if he disliked/hated the job, it would feel like he'd been there longer
The kids intentionally locked up the animatronics' servos each morning to force the staff to leave them running overnight. Sounds like the kind of crafty ruse the puppet would come up with to give its friends some freedom.
In my theory, Take Cake IS at fredbears, the Freddy sprite lacks ears and has a large tophat, and the FNaF 4 Fredbear plushie also has no ears and a large hat. I think this is Scott trying to retcon that Take Cake’s Freddy is actually Fredbear, as his design wasn’t finalized in the game that first hinted at his existence.
Also The Inclusion Of FNAF 4 in Help wanted most likely implies that FE is full on aware that Afton Experiments on kids and Are Also Full On Aware Of Afton’s Secret SL Underground bunker.
The Withereds Designs are only proof that FNAF 2 takes place before FNAF 1. Remember, they are Ugly, so obviously Fazbear Entertainment would rebuild those Animatronics suits but having the same Endoskeletons, so they're The same
Dream theory was never cannon. It was just something MatPat pulled out of his ass cause he couldn’t solve the box. All those Easter eggs in the mini games such as the Figures of the toy animatronics was meant to connect to Happiest Day not dream theory since Happiest day was meant for the Crying child. It’s the reason he never told what was originally inside the box.
here is how phone guy died in my opinion : bonnie came to the door and foxy did too and then chica came from the other side and freddy did the same leading to phone guy closing both doors. and he was scared and then when he checked the cam with the freddy post golden freddy appeared. and killed phone guy. so who did kill phone guy? the answer is now yours.
I posted a video and Short on the topic if you’re interested.. In short, one of the functions of the frontal lobe is expressive language and Abby is said to hardly talk to Mike and others around her :)
@@bonswootch thanks for repeating what I said, and what I mentioned that you said, lol... she seems pretty normal, maybe general depression from not having parents, to something like auspergers/autism ... but there is no way I'd look at her and think, 'she has no frontal lobe!', lol Which video? I will probably watch them all anyway, this one was pretty good.
I got an idea for freddy fazbears pizza hire a miget to work the nightshift they can work security and if caught they are unstuffable you gotta remember the suits are adult height so most of the damage is in the facial area so if they get stuffed they just have to get comfortable and watch out for wires and they are good or they could hide in the lockers problem solved
This is random but isn’t it weird that there are five nights at Freddy’s games that don’t take place at Freddy’s like fnaf 4, sister location, and ucn ( also technically 3 takes place in Fazbear fright) it’s also funny that In some games don’t have 5 nights like pizza sim (ends on Saturday also not at night) 2 (6th night is Cannon) 1 (6th night is cannon) 4 (6th night is likely cannon) 5 (custom night I think is cannon) and ucn (infinite nights) so in some of these games you DON’T spend five nights at Freddy’s pretty funny right
Mangle is female and is unpissessed, but Foxy has always been a boy so it would make sense why they'd refer to it as such. Even in AR, its clearly a female suffering from body dysmorphia on account of being a literal torn apart wreck. It also having 2 heads and an extra hand probably plays a part in it, I wouldn't doubt that they had 2 Foxy's initially due to that one teaser and some of his parts got mixed in EDIT: they likely swapped endos out, which would make sense why they would have some understanding of how to do it themselves since they were alluded to having thinking capabilities that early on and acting autonomously. That said, I'm pretty sure the phone guy is just ignorant to the fact that they're posessed liked you also figured
@@seanmarley3598 she's clearly the dominant one with control over the body, and only one of the 2 with an actual personality. At most, the other head might be parroting her as she speaks on account of it sounding like 2 people speaking when she does.
I think the second hand on mangle was a parot like Rockstar foxy has, and the extra arm it's attached to is stiffer with less joint hinting at a tail aswell
So my question is, who is still running Fazbear Entertainment then since we got Security Breach? I’m recently new to the lore and I know enough about Aston but he couldn’t have built the new Mega Pizzaria. So we need to dive into who is still running the show.
I guess this went unwritten, but the video was supposed to be going over the phone calls of all locations. As I worked on the video I added things like FNAF 4’s minigame because there weren’t any phone calls to tell its story but I didn’t really use many others. I’m sorry that upset you but I still mentioned the DCI that it depicts through evidence we have from the phone calls. I hope this makes sense :)
He was at FredBears in fnaf three theres a tape where phoneguy tells you how to use a springlock suit you even showed them in the video (you probably already noticed)
He tells us in those tapes that he’s at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, presumably the first one, where they used springlock suits. He was most likely never at Fredbear’s since he hardly knows the name of the diner as shown in FNAF 2.
Interesting how dark the place is I wonder how many locations are around with the Faz Restaurants ? I've also watched Five Nights At Treasure Island now this has all of these Disney characters acting badly towards guests but is it the same kind of situation like Fazbears ? 🐻 🐥 🦊 🐰 😱 aaaaaaaaaaaaaa !!!!! mazing fun .
Chica seems more logical that any of the others Foxy bangs so Bonnie’s out, Freddy laughs so he was moving rooms and golden Freddy has a different jumpscare
I think the Withered animatronics changing appearance between games, or at least Freddy and Bonnie, can be explained by the appearance of Fredbear. In UCN, we learn that Fredbear is all but a recolor of Freddy, with extremely minor differences like more squarish ears and a slightly smaller muzzle. It’s entirely possible that, rather than repairing Withered Freddy’s suit, the company just dyed old Fredbear suits, since the Withereds’ suits were so damaged likely from being dismantled. Not only would this explain Fredbear looking so close to Freddy, but it would also explain Bonnie being a near recolor of Freddy in the first game, since it’s the only time that’s the case. And since the only real difference between Freddy and Bonnie’s suits is the head, and it’s the only part of Withered Bonnie we don’t see, I think it could be possible that they just made an amalgam of Fredbear’s suit and the original Bonnie’s head. A lack of spare Withered suits could also explain why Foxy is out of order in FNaF1; he isn’t any faultier than the others, they just don’t have any spare legs, feet, and torsos for him, because he couldn’t just use Fredbear’s or Spring Bonnie’s. Only real problem here is Chica, who has a new suit that doesn’t match the older animatronics, but hey maybe they could only afford a single new suit and just had to play some stitch work to weed out their priorities.
When it come to why Crying Child is Scared of the Animatronics, thanks to Tales of the Pizzaplex we might be wrong about William motive (which Movie also helped too) that he was messed up and likely did the FNAF 4 Nightmare experiment as early as Freddy's was open and did it to his own child, and he might have had an underground Bunker for longer then we through? William more and more seem like a man with Twisted Morals trying to discover who knows what (immortally likely so far) and wasn't invested on the Image and Look of FredBear or Freddy's Locations as he likely saw them as useful tools for Money and Robotic supplies.
I mean the creator's of springlocks are somewhat dumb.like literally they could go spin the springlock around and there. ,it won't be too hard on the body.
Uh Mangle is not Male it's a robot, bug Scott has like made a joke official that the Mangle's gender is "Yes" which is why he's referred to with those sets of pronouns
I hope you enjoyed the video! New video on FNAF 1-3 Easter Eggs coming soon! :D
Hey, um “what seen in shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child” most likely means BV never saw anything, nothing devious was going on he just THOUGHT he saw something
That makes a lot of sense! :)
He COULD have seen a springlock failure. No particular reason, just throwing my hat in the ring.
@user-nm1lx8qb3u but then why would that be a misunderstanding? A springlock failure is literally someone being skewered alive, not much of a misunderstanding
Actually that line refers to how BV witnessed Elizabeth get killed by Circus Baby. Thats why Nightmare and Nightmare Fredbear have teeth on their stomachs, like mouths. The stomach is where Circus baby's claw comes out of. So in his eyes, as a child, it looks like the animatronic ate his sister. Mystery solved?
@bonD6002 ok but that's not much of a "misunderstanding" but something that could be used for the stomach mouths is we literally see an employee half inside a suit, to a little kid who is misunderstanding things that could look like the suit has a stomach at the torso and ate the man's legs
In a way, even William ended up a victim to Fazbear Entertainment just like their employees, having their deaths covered up and hidden away. After Willaim was springlocked, he was discovered in the saferoom and they sealed it with his body in it. Not just in that location, but in almost every other location to avoid suspicion. It shows how experienced they are with hiding incidents to keep their business going, like with the "missing" nightguards. Fazbear Entertainment was the one to discover him, because in Fnaf 2, phone guy tells us in a startled tone, "The yellow one, someone used it", implying that they found William springlocked in the suit. They then left him there to be forgotten when they abandoned the building with the dismantled fnaf 1 animatronics. What's even more bizarre is that when he was rediscovered 30 years later, they intended to use the suit containing his corpse as the main attraction. Exploiting a dead guy for profit. The company is literally worthy of it's own netflix documentary, they are true villains.
There's also lots of things and loopholes in the lore that dont make sense because Scott said he didnt expect people to beat the game. He said fnaf 1 was meant to be unbeatable, which means he hadn't planned the lore that far ahead, so the "odor" comment was most likely a joke that he ended up continuing throughout the games, and had no lore implication to Michael. Or the odor could also just be coming from the animatronics themselves, as people complained about the smell since they were stuffed with bodies and never cleaned.
You sir, are great
What I think is that Henry found him and notified the company
I think they knew he used it to kill someone, but not that it was him. In the dismantling mini games in 3, it’s obvious the building is run down & no longer in use
I don't think he got sprintrapped during fnaf2, but he definitively committed murders there and used the suit. The company didn't cover the murders up well enough because they're investigated and shut down. We see it in the Save Them minigame.
I think all of the questions you had about Freddy Fazbear's Pizza 1993 can be answered like you said: Phone Guy's full of shit. Fazbear Entertainment is full of shit. They don't care for their employees or customers as much as they should. They only care for those fat stacks 💰 and are more than willing to lie, manipulate, and perform various cover ups just to stay in business as long as possible.
And the longer they stay open, the worse they get. Help Wanted (both the game and the story in Tales from the Pizzaplex) show them at their absolute lowest.
I agree. I’m not sure if William or Henry are involved in Fazbear Entertainment but it seems like they sold out and were taken advantage of.
@@bonswootch I always pegged Henry as someone who had genuine love and passion for his restaurant, Fredbear's. Maybe the Bite of '83 forced him to close his doors and get bought out by FE? Then again, who knows how long that lasted if it did happen considering it's implied he disappeared after losing Charlie.
Nice video, btw. The analysis of Phone Guy's recordings and calls is what I've gotten interested in as well in trying to figure the restaurants in Fruity Maze and Midnight Motorist.
@@Takejiro24My theory/HC is that Henry was charged for Charlie’s murder. That would explain why the newspapers in fnaf one say that there was someone who was caught. Henry would have had his stake confiscated and given to William, who could then attempt to cover up the MCI and appoint incompetent employees before selling his stake and being able to afford the SL bunker.
@@Anonyomus_commenter The idea of getting blamed for the murder of your own child is *wild.*
@@Anonyomus_commenter I think william was the owner and after killing Charlie was charged and found guilty and ownership would later go to henry but william was later let out due to lack of evidence or something like that
The thing which confuses me the most recently is the existence of the costumes in mimic chase sequence in ruin.
I don’t know what the purpose of it’s existence and revelance is but maybe a good idea to look into?
Maybe they might be the odd-looking costumes revealed from Phone Dude in Fnaf 3?
Thanks for another great video! Can’t wait for more!
Thanks! Glad to hear that :) I’ve also been thinking about the importance of the temporary costumes from FNAF 3. It could just be filler dialogue or it could be important. As of right now, I don’t see what it means for the lore if anything, but perhaps something will dawn on me :)
@@bonswootch Do you not know about the Mimic suits, or did you purposefully ignore that part of the comment?
@@curioustinman3348 I read that. I just have a hard time connecting those two things because they take place almost 50 years apart. I suppose it’s possible that those were the suits used in FNAF 3’s cassettes, but does that really solve anything? It still leaves the question of why/is it relevant that the temporary costumes weren’t appropriate back at the first restaurant. And why explain that now? There’s been like 7 games in between and that detail from FNAF 3 seems pretty minor for them to explain it in the latest game. That’s just my take on it.
@@bonswootchI don't think it's supposed to "solve" anything. I think after pizza sim, Scott has added lore through callbacks to jokes & offhanded comments to be made into lore for future stories.
11:38 ish:
"... that the Spring Bonnie costume has been noticeably moved."
Meanwhile, Spring Trap is just standing there.
The timing on that got a chuckle out of me.
26:23
“Tampering” might just be Michael trying to free the souls from their animatronic jails.
Dismantling them, burning them, etc
Which doesn’t require mechanical expertise, but Michael has grown up around William who was obsessed with robots… among other things
Or maybe he was trying to look for Ralph's body
28:20 "20 years without a bath" might be the "one retcon" Scott said he made, specifically them existing for 20 years
I hope your videos blow up more. You have brought to light things that a lot of the community have overlooked.
Thank you! That makes me really happy to hear :) I hope you enjoy these videos :D
Phone Guy said "Technician' singular, rather then the plural which you said. when talking about the animatronics being looked at, so there was likely only IONE technician, not multiple. I know it's just a small detail, but still.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention :) I do think it’s important to analyze every detail, so I’ll take that into consideration in the future!
No problem and thanks
Also, something I didn't mention, how did KIDS take Mangle apart... that makes no sense unless they have super strength or something,
Like Mangle is an animatronic made of hard metals...
Yes, I know it has been days, but still I thought this was important enough ro come back here.
@@Comfy_GlitchXmaybe they threw their drinks on it or something.
@@Comfy_GlitchX Tell me you've watched BlackFootFerret's Fnaf theories without saying that you've watched BlackFootFerret's Fnaf theories.
33:10 I think, even at the time fnaf 1 was released, this was supposed to be a lie. It was already clear the place was haunted by children when fnaf 1 came out. The posters of the animatronics occasionally change to drawings of crying children, the newspapers talk about children going missing, and blood leaking out of the animatronics. There is no rule about endo-skeletons being out of their suit, that’s a lie to coverup the hauntings.
34:09 my theory is that in the dark, the animatronics cannot see very well, so their sight is likely movement based, and due to the fact that the parts and service room is pretty dark, as well as the fact that the endo skeleton doesn’t move at all means that the animatronics don’t recognize it as a endo skeleton
17:20 phone guy mentions that the withered animatronics are being used for parts, but the toy animatronics don’t have that many parts and are thus only partially possessed and act closer to their programming
One thing I realized about phone guys death is he was asking us to find him
“I always wandered what was in those empty heads. Back there, do me a favor and check inside them for me”
“I’m going to try and hold out”
He was going to try and stay alive and wait for us to find him, we didn’t find him 😢
19:30 in UCN Funtime(?) Foxy has a parrot. I like to think Mangle originally had a parrot and thats where the extra head comes from
Oh you mean Rockstar foxy
For the toys that’s not entirely true
The withered were being used as spare parts so it’s possible agony was transferred over to the toys and corrupted there programming
Also fnaf 2’s are likely akso pre recording since the gameplay takes place in November and that autumn/spring depending on the hemisphere
That makes sense. The spare parts could definitely have influenced the Toy Animatronics. As for the recording date.. it’s very strange to me. The restaurant was only open for a few short weeks, but the recordings seem to take place months prior and reference the new toy animatronics. As of right now I don’t have a solid explanation for that. Definitely something to consider in another video :)
@@bonswootch mats recently been advocating the closing shift guard theory so it could be that
@@jmurray1110 Since the paychecks are very clearly using the FNaF 1 checks as a base, Scott might have just forgot to change the month.
cool video! really like the production value and this kind of analysis/compilation of info from the first four games is nice to have 😼as for 26:40, i interpreted 'family pizzeria' as it being more of a pizzeria *for* families to eat and not a family-run/owned restaurant (assuming that's what you interpreted it to mean)
Thanks! I’m glad you liked it! Good point, that makes a lot of sense! :) New videos coming soon!
Videos like these make me very happy we're still theorizing FNAF and discussing history.
Even though I know (especially for the first game) Scott just made a creepy Showbiz-Chuck E Cheese style horror game with meaningless lore that he then ran with it because the game got so popular, I still love thinking about the REAL story about what was going on
Neat video! Here are my thoughts as I watched:
16:57 Something to note is that they used the Withereds, which were already haunted, for parts, suggesting that those parts were used in the Toys, which might mean that the MCI kids are also possessing the Toys through those shared parts. Alternatively, the SAVE THEM kids might be involved.
19:15 You just said that the Toys aren't possessed. Make up your mind.
19:34 Since they have a Parts and Service room full of spare parts, not to mention the Withereds, they probably put in some spare parts to enhance the "attraction".
20:48 Plus, it doesn't have a facial recognition system like the others, or at least isn't really said to. If we take FNaF 5 into account, its circuitry might be almost totally fried and thus give the spirit within nearly full control.
22:31 Very much haunted behavior.
26:27 Alternatively, he smells _because_ he was tampering with the smelly Withereds.
34:05 Those teeth are the player's, as suggested when Phone Guy mentioned them popping out the front of the mask.
37:08 This matches their Help Wanted behavior (despite it probably being new management), though it's also possible that tampering with the smelly animatronics also leaves you stinky.
Hey thanks! I’m glad you liked it.
16:57 That’s a good point, perhaps some of the possessed parts made their way into the Toy’s. As for the SAVE THEM kids, that is what I was leaning towards in this video, however, it could certainly be either.
19:15 What I meant was that they weren’t possessed at the start of the game, but perhaps they became possessed as the days go on, thus the building being on lockdown and the animatronics behavior changing. I apologize if I didn’t make that evident.
19:34 I suppose that is possible.. if that is the case it makes me questions Fazbear Entertainment’s choices even more-one of their characters has extra skeletal parts.. creepy.
20:48 Sounds good to me. As the “Security Puppet” it’s funny they never worked any of the newer upgrades into it. Then again, it was likely an older character and now resides inside of a box.
22:31 Maybe.. but Phone Guy emphasizes their strange behavior and that someone might have tampered with their facial recognition systems.
26:27 Perhaps. That would make these seemingly two pieces of evidence really just one. As if we don’t have enough information already! xD
34:05 That’s very possible.. even though he said that I just didn’t think they looked anything like human teeth, but it’s possible that is what is shown. So maybe there is maybe there isn’t an endo skeleton in there too. Even if that isn’t the case, that was just a small theory and shouldn’t take away from the rest of the narrative.
37:08 I threw that in there because I’ve heard people say that but I don’t believe they just made up “odor”. I do believe that Scott put that in there for one reason or another; whether it be to show that he’s a corpse or to further emphasize what’s he’s been doing with the animatronics. Or.. it could’ve been a joke in the first game that Scott turned into a running gag in the prequel.. Not sure :)
Thanks again for your comments, I’m glad to hear feedback and discuss theories!
@@bonswootchi think the remnant of the save them kids were put in the funtimes, thats the moltendci theory
@@bonswootch Thank you for responding and clarifying some points, that is very helpful. One thing about the teeth is that Scott is notoriously bad at modeling humans, and the game over screen just needed to get across the idea that "hey, your face is DESTROYED inside of this thing", so vaguely human and less-rectangular teeth were good enough.
27:02 I think he managed the fnaf 2 location, that's why he's on the phone then he got demoted to night guard and decided he would quit after that.
That’s an interesting theory.. maybe with their new low-budget venture he wasn’t getting paid as much as he used to? :)
I think the coverup and investigation for the original Missing Children Incident lasted 4 years, from 83 to 87. That includes the investigation of Charlie's death. FNAF2 is when Purple Guy was finally identified as the one that "used the yellow suit". He was obviously the dayshift guard who was terminated. But while the investigation was going on for 4 years, Fazbear Entertainment took measures to reassure the patrons that it was safe. That's when they upgraded the animatronics with links to a criminal database, etc. It's unclear if all 5 disappearances happened at the same time and I don't think it makes any difference. I imagine Purple Guy spread out his crimes as to avoid suspicion. His first crime, however, was shown in Take Cake, and gave birth to the possessed Puppet. The details of this are unclear. Was it a hit and run? Did he stab her? Was it even "The" Purple Guy or some other Purple Guy? UCN's Puppet says something curious about how she's not mad at the player. If we play as the killer in UCN, and this killer killed Charlie intentionally, why would she "forgive" him like that? It's very fishy. If the UCN player killed Charlie, it was an accident. If the UCN player didn't kill Charlie, then who did? I have to wonder sometimes about the Security Puppet minigame. The skid marks in the road suggest someone either braked quickly or accelerated quickly. And it was raining and dark and in an alleyway. What if someone simply ran into her then fled the scene? This would explain why Charlie was able to remain self-aware as a spirit. She didn't die some gruesome prolonged death, she died suddenly in an accident. This also explains Henry's choice of words when talking to William at the end of FFPS. He still calls him "old friend" but curiously doesn't accuse William of killing his daughter. I really think there is some huge misconception. If the serial killer responsible for the MCI also killed Charlie, her death was an accident. That's why Puppet's not mad at him anymore. That's why she recognizes him but isn't afraid of him anymore. And I'm inclined to say it had to be the MCI killer, because of Toy Chica's High School Years montage. She starts off already having a body part in her bag and I believe this is in reference to Charlie's death being the killer's first kill, albeit an unintentional one. It's curious that Toy Chica doesn't explain that first kill, don't you think?
28:13 That song is a literal Bop!!!!
One of the best parts of the movie xD
@@bonswootch I have a theory that Fritz Smith is Phone Guy and that he was one of the first people to work for Fazbear Entertainment and he is killed by the animatronics when Afton decides that Fritz knows too much about what is going on
10:09 -Charlie is an unreliable narrator though. Henry made sure she did not know she was not the original Charlie and gave her and artificial memories. She believed her brother was the one snatched and was less questioning on her father's odd intentions. She just dismisses the closets and even refers to one as the door for the little doll that actually is her conscious self. She also does not remember or know aspects of certain bots and the restaurant. Henry programmed her memories and knowledge to numb her inhibitions on the shadier aspects of his inventions. She may just think or remember him as dismantling anything dangerous because that falls in line with what he wanted her to think. We know this isn't even truly the case as he not only made a bot to kill himself but left the Baby bot functional yet unfinished. He told his sister to destroy the current Charlie but just ran off to die himself. This brings up the other aspect. The Henry form the games is much more a protagonist from what we saw but Henry in the books, while not a strait up villain, is not the same good guy. He clearly has less steadfast morality than his counterpart. Sure the trauma of losing his child leads to mental illness that can be used to explain some of it but there are hints he had to be off format he start and only sank further as a result. A lot of the tech he was working on and behavior like his lack of proper supervision over Charlie lead us to believe he was not the most responsible guy. part of a huge difference is that he was the one to make Charlie how she is in the book while the puppet Charlie in the games was an accident. Book Henry specifically went into insane Frankenstein inventor trying to make new vessels for his daughter to sort of live in and became obsessed. It inferedly drive away his wife and the one kid he still had a live. Henry in the books is fixed on making things over the things he has. He only really gets so bent on bringing Charlie back because she was now a project. He realized eventually how wrong that is and how she should never have been entwined into the toxic part of his life to form an abomination. That's why he decided to kill himself. When invested in his work, book Henry absolutely seems the kind of guy who may allow dangerous inventions to be used as a stepping stone to something greater. Why dismantle and start from scratch the. You can test, implement and rework for better and better versions?
Oh wow I didn’t ever think about the “we’re moving you to the day shift” being because they were worried Afton was swiping kids. That makes sense though!
I’m glad you found that interesting! :)
Yay glad to see another upload
:D I hope you enjoy it!
@@bonswootchI sure hope I do, this has been pretty entertaining so far.
I have a thought on why Mangle's second head and hand are there in its model.
The staff had extra parts leftover from the Original Funtime Foxy, and just decided to throw them there just for the heck of it when no one was looking.
I have no evidence to back this up, but I personally have this as a sort of small headcanon of mine.
19:36 my theory is that one of the children went into the parts and service or somewhere and grabbed some extra parts, thus explaining the fact that mangle has 2 heads and 2 right hands
Gotta love these evil game companies! 😄 There's no way they didn't notice the bodies in the old suits during the remodels, or William in the springtrap suit before they walled him up. I have a feeling Phone Guy gets massive bonuses for hush money.
Fnaf 2 being a "grand re-opening" of a "vintage restaurant" and the phone guy's dialogue suggests it's an older location that's being re-opened. The "kid friendly" upgrades are the new AI and the ability to move around on their own so they can protect children. That explains Mangle (and the Mangle toy in fnaf4). Since parts of the withered animations were used to repair the toys, I don't think they were ever individually possessed. After the shut down the toys are scrapped and used to repair the withered.
"What's going on out there" is missing kids, and it's being connected to the restaurant because the kids spent time there. William definitively murdered there because we're in the fnaf2 location in Save Them, where the Puppet activates Freddie to "save them" while the others are still dormant. The company must not have covered the blood bath up well enough since they're being investigated and eventually shut down.
In fnaf2 Phone Guy says it isn't possible for the old animatronics to move around on their own, so that was a new thing with the toys. Either they assume the remodel after fnaf2 gave the old models that ability, or the company knows they're haunted by now and are trying to hush that up too. I think it's the latter because phone guy is clearly lying to us in fnaf1.
And if there's a Fredbear plush, why couldn't there be a Spring Bonnie? They might just be older than the current toy line, and any toy with a mechanic could be a finger trap.
1:49 I doubt since it was included in that joke leak from scott during ucn’s developed it where it was next to 2 theories that were famously never true (Foxy is a good guy & Phone guy is the killer). Although to be quite honest I miss when the story was flexible enough that out there theories like dream theory could work. I had a couple of my own back when that I doubt hold up anymore (although modern fnaf is too dense for me to check them).
Was that: "now tell me father" playing in the background at 3:50?
It’s “Underneath” from FNAF World :)
@@bonswootch whoops my mistake 🤣
@@Goddess_Aleu_White_Wolf No problem :)
Let's be honest here, Fazbear Entertainment cares more about profit than they do about employee safety, customer safety, OSHA guidelines and FDA regulations (this isn't too much of a surprise since the fictional company is set in America. There's a very good reason why most American food is illegal in other parts of the world).
Though the books are in a separate universe (a parallel one, where everything is mostly the same, or is an equivalent of that thing, that's in the main games), they do help us to see how this company operates. One story that stuck out to me was called 'Pizza Kit'. While not having a whole lot of lore, the premise is a disturbing one. Someone falls into a pizza sauce vat, and instead of telling someone about it and stopping production, Fazbear Entertainment just continues on with making pizzas, knowing full well that they have human...uh... remains in them. Like, wth.
Another story (a classic in my opinion) is 'Fetch'. This one has more lore relevance. Fetch is described as looking older than the protagonist's parents (when modern tech didn't exist) yet is able to connect with modern smartphone technology. This kind of implies that Fazbear Entertainment has more advanced tech than the rest of the world does, in this universe. Which does explain why the tech does seem a little strange to us as people playing the games. We always thought "Wow, this is super high tech and sci-fi". Yes, it was. But it doesn't reflect the technological advancements made by everyone else in this world. We have no indicator on where the rest of the Freddy's world is in terms of industrial advancement.
Technically no one was killed by the vat. Or atleast, the MCs friend wasn't.
Fetch is also possessed/infected with agony. So it was probably normal when built.
@@daneiltherat2327 I’m pretty sure the fact that Fetch can connect to phones has nothing to do with remnant or agony. The tech existed already, before any kind of possession happened.
@@Jumpyman_thegamerYT i meant Fetchs maliciousness. Most likely before that it was a normal dog.
I have an answer for the bite of 83 simple that since fredbear has a bigger jaw then most the anmatronics as seen in fnaf 4 it possible that a more powerful part was used to move his jaw but under pressure of Evans head lead to him getting hurt from the buildup of pressure
The Finger trap spring bonnie hand puppet could just be an old toy so those characters could have be around in one form or another for long time even compared to the events of 4
I could see Phone Guy using the 20 year time as just a ballpark number, since he had been in the company so long, and was kind of rambling. Just overestimating, how long it had been. Especially if he disliked/hated the job, it would feel like he'd been there longer
The kids intentionally locked up the animatronics' servos each morning to force the staff to leave them running overnight.
Sounds like the kind of crafty ruse the puppet would come up with to give its friends some freedom.
Circus Baby can only run her capture program when there's one child in the room. Definitely seeing someone getting in a suit
In my theory, Take Cake IS at fredbears, the Freddy sprite lacks ears and has a large tophat, and the FNaF 4 Fredbear plushie also has no ears and a large hat. I think this is Scott trying to retcon that Take Cake’s Freddy is actually Fredbear, as his design wasn’t finalized in the game that first hinted at his existence.
17:39 i mean kids wouldn't bat a eye at this design its the teens and adult who are making it look sus
That’s true. It’s just because a lot of people teased me for saying that the new animatronics were super kid friendly in a different video xD
@@bonswootch oh ok
@@bonswootch The safety updates were! 😄The designs are clearly older
Also The Inclusion Of FNAF 4 in Help wanted most likely implies that FE is full on aware that Afton Experiments on kids and Are Also Full On Aware Of Afton’s Secret SL Underground bunker.
The Withereds Designs are only proof that FNAF 2 takes place before FNAF 1. Remember, they are Ugly, so obviously Fazbear Entertainment would rebuild those Animatronics suits but having the same Endoskeletons, so they're The same
The problem is the fnaf 1 plushies in the fnaf 2 location
34:12
Maybe they are doing that because they remember when they were putted in the suits there was the endo skeleton in the animatronics.
I was expecting you explaning how fazbear entertainment get money to build the pizza plex
Maybe that’ll be in a future video :) Did you enjoy the video anyways?
18:40 I don't really get why Fazbear Entertainment allowed children to dismember one of their animatronics
I think cc saw the gas experiments by William in accident, thats what causes his fear of the animatronics in fnaf 4, as told in dittophobia
That could be :)
Dream theory was never cannon. It was just something MatPat pulled out of his ass cause he couldn’t solve the box. All those Easter eggs in the mini games such as the Figures of the toy animatronics was meant to connect to Happiest Day not dream theory since Happiest day was meant for the Crying child. It’s the reason he never told what was originally inside the box.
Maybe I’ll do a video on it later, but I find dream theory really compelling.
Thank you! It drives me crazy that this misconception is still around when even fnaf4 is full of evidence that disproves it.
@@vanyadolly also sister location literally being a direct follow up to the things that happened in that game.
here is how phone guy died in my opinion :
bonnie came to the door and foxy did too and then chica came from the other side and freddy did the same leading to phone guy closing both doors. and he was scared and then when he checked the cam with the freddy post golden freddy appeared. and killed phone guy.
so who did kill phone guy? the answer is now yours.
Whoa! You think Abby seems like someone missing her frontal lobe??? She is just quiet and colors alot... lol. Where do you get all that?
I posted a video and Short on the topic if you’re interested.. In short, one of the functions of the frontal lobe is expressive language and Abby is said to hardly talk to Mike and others around her :)
@@bonswootch thanks for repeating what I said, and what I mentioned that you said, lol... she seems pretty normal, maybe general depression from not having parents, to something like auspergers/autism ... but there is no way I'd look at her and think, 'she has no frontal lobe!', lol
Which video? I will probably watch them all anyway, this one was pretty good.
@@bonswootchthat's just autism
I got an idea for freddy fazbears pizza hire a miget to work the nightshift they can work security and if caught they are unstuffable you gotta remember the suits are adult height so most of the damage is in the facial area so if they get stuffed they just have to get comfortable and watch out for wires and they are good or they could hide in the lockers problem solved
This is random but isn’t it weird that there are five nights at Freddy’s games that don’t take place at Freddy’s like fnaf 4, sister location, and ucn ( also technically 3 takes place in Fazbear fright) it’s also funny that In some games don’t have 5 nights like pizza sim (ends on Saturday also not at night) 2 (6th night is Cannon) 1 (6th night is cannon) 4 (6th night is likely cannon) 5 (custom night I think is cannon) and ucn (infinite nights) so in some of these games you DON’T spend five nights at Freddy’s
pretty funny right
xD
Mangle is female and is unpissessed, but Foxy has always been a boy so it would make sense why they'd refer to it as such. Even in AR, its clearly a female suffering from body dysmorphia on account of being a literal torn apart wreck. It also having 2 heads and an extra hand probably plays a part in it, I wouldn't doubt that they had 2 Foxy's initially due to that one teaser and some of his parts got mixed in
EDIT: they likely swapped endos out, which would make sense why they would have some understanding of how to do it themselves since they were alluded to having thinking capabilities that early on and acting autonomously. That said, I'm pretty sure the phone guy is just ignorant to the fact that they're posessed liked you also figured
Mangle isn't female, the reason why its gender is yes was due fused between male and female endoskeleton
@@seanmarley3598 she's clearly the dominant one with control over the body, and only one of the 2 with an actual personality. At most, the other head might be parroting her as she speaks on account of it sounding like 2 people speaking when she does.
I think Henry left the company after Charlotte's death, but later rejoined between the events of The First Pizzeria Closing and FNAF 2
The extreme safety upgrades does seem like a Henry thing. Poor guy probably gave up after that.
I think the second hand on mangle was a parot like Rockstar foxy has, and the extra arm it's attached to is stiffer with less joint hinting at a tail aswell
fingertrap = plushtrap easy canon fact.
;)
I just have a clarifying question. When you’re showing the bring cake mini game and say Freddy is seen with pizza (4:26) wtf are you talking about
I know it went by kinda fast, but there was something that popped up correcting his mistake
@@Forgottensnapdragon I’m questioning him saying that it’s never referenced that cake is sold at the restaurant. That is a ridiculous statement.
So my question is, who is still running Fazbear Entertainment then since we got Security Breach? I’m recently new to the lore and I know enough about Aston but he couldn’t have built the new Mega Pizzaria. So we need to dive into who is still running the show.
It feels like both William and Fazbear Ent. are the over-arching antagonists of the franchise. Even if it is for different reasons…
Holy shit that's the same year secret of the mimic is going to take place 1:00
let's say charlie is a 7 year old but died in 1983 (6 six months before the bite of 83')
Charlie 100 percent died shortly after c.c, as an act of revenge. It just does not make sense for her to die before, as there is not motive.
The Fact that you did not even mention The SaveThem Minigame makes me so mad
I guess this went unwritten, but the video was supposed to be going over the phone calls of all locations. As I worked on the video I added things like FNAF 4’s minigame because there weren’t any phone calls to tell its story but I didn’t really use many others. I’m sorry that upset you but I still mentioned the DCI that it depicts through evidence we have from the phone calls. I hope this makes sense :)
@bonswootch Ok I understand, Great video Btw Keep up the good work
@@tramspected403 Thank you so much! I’m glad to hear you enjoyed it :D
He was at FredBears in fnaf three theres a tape where phoneguy tells you how to use a springlock suit you even showed them in the video (you probably already noticed)
He tells us in those tapes that he’s at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, presumably the first one, where they used springlock suits. He was most likely never at Fredbear’s since he hardly knows the name of the diner as shown in FNAF 2.
Showing fnaf 3 gameplay is jumpscaring me
xD Never again :)
Interesting how dark the place is I wonder how many locations are around with the Faz Restaurants ?
I've also watched Five Nights At Treasure Island now this has all of these Disney characters acting badly towards guests but is it the same kind of situation like Fazbears ?
🐻 🐥 🦊 🐰
😱
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa !!!!! mazing fun .
what are the name of the songs you use in this video
Yeah DSAF had a better motto for them
Sweep it under the rug it’s probably fine
xD
This is the same company with flashlights in the trashpile and a need to have balloon boys around to save toy Freddy’s shins@@bonswootch
I think freddy is brown cuz inconsistency because fredbears first apperance was in fnaf 3 and in the poster from sb there was a brown bear so idk
Chica seems more logical that any of the others
Foxy bangs so Bonnie’s out, Freddy laughs so he was moving rooms and golden Freddy has a different jumpscare
Or they attacked at the same time
I just said the others were out due to the mechanics @@Wizardjones69
why is purple guy dancing like that? I need context :
Wut if the kitchen in fnaf1 was a safe room and that’s why we can’t see on on camera
That’s possible. But the animatronics can enter it. I think that if it is in that restaurant, it’s most likely a room that we can’t see on the map. :)
@@bonswootchbut by the minigame map of fnaf 3 and fnaf 1, its in the bathroom
I think the Withered animatronics changing appearance between games, or at least Freddy and Bonnie, can be explained by the appearance of Fredbear. In UCN, we learn that Fredbear is all but a recolor of Freddy, with extremely minor differences like more squarish ears and a slightly smaller muzzle. It’s entirely possible that, rather than repairing Withered Freddy’s suit, the company just dyed old Fredbear suits, since the Withereds’ suits were so damaged likely from being dismantled. Not only would this explain Fredbear looking so close to Freddy, but it would also explain Bonnie being a near recolor of Freddy in the first game, since it’s the only time that’s the case. And since the only real difference between Freddy and Bonnie’s suits is the head, and it’s the only part of Withered Bonnie we don’t see, I think it could be possible that they just made an amalgam of Fredbear’s suit and the original Bonnie’s head. A lack of spare Withered suits could also explain why Foxy is out of order in FNaF1; he isn’t any faultier than the others, they just don’t have any spare legs, feet, and torsos for him, because he couldn’t just use Fredbear’s or Spring Bonnie’s. Only real problem here is Chica, who has a new suit that doesn’t match the older animatronics, but hey maybe they could only afford a single new suit and just had to play some stitch work to weed out their priorities.
When it come to why Crying Child is Scared of the Animatronics, thanks to Tales of the Pizzaplex we might be wrong about William motive (which Movie also helped too) that he was messed up and likely did the FNAF 4 Nightmare experiment as early as Freddy's was open and did it to his own child, and he might have had an underground Bunker for longer then we through? William more and more seem like a man with Twisted Morals trying to discover who knows what (immortally likely so far) and wasn't invested on the Image and Look of FredBear or Freddy's Locations as he likely saw them as useful tools for Money and Robotic supplies.
*phone guy is william afton*
Hmm.. ;)
No he's not
A bold new spin on the phone guy is the murderer theory!
W
:) Good to see you again!
@@bonswootchthings were happening irl that i wont get into but ty good to be back
@@takido.-. Good to hear it :)
I mean the creator's of springlocks are somewhat dumb.like literally they could go spin the springlock around and there. ,it won't be too hard on the body.
theres no audio
Where?
Yes there is
Bearfaz beartenfazment
xD
@@bonswootch Holy sheiße I'm so funny I got a heart
@@bananaspice1967 I liked it xD
@@bonswootch That means I'm certified funny now
i think the cc whitnessed a springlock failure
Possibly yeah ;)
I think the crying child saw a early circus baby nothing more
Tbh, I always read Abby as an undiagnosed autistic character. And thats comming from someone who is autistic
I can totally see that. I’d like to rewatch the movie and see how they might imply that, I think that’s a really interesting take! :)
"There's no Ethical Consumption under Capitalism".. This phrase is appropriated to Fazbear's Entertainment.
Uh Mangle is not Male it's a robot, bug Scott has like made a joke official that the Mangle's gender is "Yes" which is why he's referred to with those sets of pronouns