Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Transportation. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Transportation|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Transportation. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

Additional debates categorized as dealing with Transportation related issues may also be listed at Category:AfD debates (Places and transportation).


Transportation

[edit]

New Lynn to Avondale shared path

[edit]
New Lynn to Avondale shared path (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any RS providing SIGCOV, just news releases covering the announcement. The current sourcing is just two different advocacy groups and Auckland Transport. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jamna Auto Industries

[edit]
Jamna Auto Industries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like establishing new manufacturing units, acquiring others' production units, expanding overseas business by appointing an expat etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May Mobility

[edit]
May Mobility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent WP:SUSTAINED notability with WP:RS Amigao (talk) 21:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operational flight plan

[edit]
Operational flight plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicative of flight plan (and flight planning). I initially redirected this to flight plan in November, but was reverted by the article's creator last month. This article is little more than a dictionary definition of the subject, and I see no evidence its continued existence is justified when it can easily be incorporated in either flight plan or flight planning. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsed wall of text added by Leksey. Trainsandotherthings (talk)
  • Example 1: Filed Flight Plan (FPL)
    (FPL-AAL123-IS
    -B738/M-SDE2E3FGHIJ3J4J5M1RWXYZ/SB1D1
    -KJFK0250
    -N0455F300 DCT MERIT J80 LVZ J230 AIR J80 DJB DCT
    -KORD0210 KDTW
    -PBN/A1B1C1D1L1O1S1S2 NAV/RNVD1E2A1 DOF/230425 REG/N917NN EET/KZOB0034 CZYZ0051 SEL/ABCD OPR/AAL)
    Example 2: Operational Flight Plan (OFP / CFP)
    N172SB/11 APR/SVO-LED Page 1
    [ OFP ]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    N172SB 11APR2025 UUEE-ULLI C172 N172SB RELEASE 0348 11APR25
    OFP 1 SHEREMETYEVO-PULKOVO
    WX PROG 1115 1118 1121 1200 OBS 1018 1018 1018 1018
    ATC C/S N172SB UUEE/SVO ULLI/LED CRZ SYS 2200RPM
    11APR2025 N172SB 1545/1605 1919/1927 GND DIST 324
    CESSNA 172R / IO-360-L2A STA 1915 AIR DIST 324
    CTOT:.... G/C DIST 324
    AVG WIND 000/000
    MAXIMUM TOW 1111 LAW 1111 ZFW 1111 AVG W/C P000
    ESTIMATED TOW 1095 LAW 1023 ZFW 949 AVG ISA P000
    AVG FF KGS/HR 22
    FUEL BIAS P00.0
    ALTN EETU TKOF ALTN .......
    FL STEPS UUEE/0120/
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    DISP RMKS WARNING: FLIGHT EXCEEDS AIRCRAFT RANGE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    PLANNED FUEL
    ---------------------------------
    FUEL ARPT FUEL TIME
    ---------------------------------
    TRIP LED 72 0314
    CONT 14 MIN 6 0014
    ALTN TAY 55 0149
    FINRES 19 0045
    ---------------------------------
    MINIMUM T/OFF FUEL 152 0603
    ---------------------------------
    EXTRA -6 0000
    ---------------------------------
    T/OFF FUEL 146 0549
    TAXI SVO 6 0020
    ---------------------------------
    BLOCK FUEL SVO 152
    PIC EXTRA .....
    TOTAL FUEL .....
    REASON FOR PIC EXTRA ............
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    FMC INFO:
    FINRES+ALTN 74
    TRIP+TAXI 78
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    NO TANKERING RECOMMENDED (P)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    I HEREWITH CONFIRM THAT I HAVE PERFORMED A THOROUGH SELF BRIEFING
    ABOUT THE DESTINATION AND ALTERNATE AIRPORTS OF THIS FLIGHT
    INCLUDING THE APPLICABLE INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES, AIRPORT
    FACILITIES, NOTAMS AND ALL OTHER RELEVANT PARTICULAR INFORMATION. (Removed possible PII)

Leksey (talk) 03:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as more or less duplicative of other articles. The Generic Content section is essentially a CLOP of [1] (linked above); the lead doesn't even say what the subject is, just some vague indications about what one could do. The two links given by Leksey essentially confirm that this is the same thing as a flight plan. The article as it stands is worse than a dictionary definition and I don't see anything worth merging – in fact, I am concerned that this might have to be deleted for copyright reasons. Toadspike [Talk] 20:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1982 Sukhumi Dranda Airport runway collision

[edit]
1982 Sukhumi Dranda Airport runway collision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has only primary (database) sourcing, and I could not find any significant coverage from a basic BEFORE search. The article has been tagged for reliance on a single source and not meeting GNG since August of last year, and no real improvements have been forthcoming. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge with Sukhumi Babushara Airport. I searched Russian sources, but no one mentions it even the history page on the official airport website. Sadly, doesn't know a good Russian database to make a perfectly throurough research. LastJabberwocky (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Sukhumi Babushara Airport as an alternative to deletion per WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT – Other than databases, there exists no reliable secondary sources that provide significant or in-depth coverage of the event nor are there any demonstrated lasting effects nor long-term impacts on a significant region of the world that would make this event notable enough for a stand-alone article. This was the best I managed to find but isn't significant coverage of the collision:

    Спустя три года, 14 августа 1982 года, в Сухумском аэропорту самолет Jet L-410 столкнулся на взлетно-посадочной полосе с Ту-134А. В авиаинциденте погибли все, кто находился в «Турболете» - 9 пассажиров и два члена экипажа.
    [Three years later, on August 14, 1982, at the Sukhumi airport, a Jet L-410 collided with a Tu-134A on the runway. The incident killed everyone on board the Turbolet - nine passengers and two crew members.]

    Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion (yacht)

[edit]
Hyperion (yacht) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The yacht lacks any notoriety whatsoever except for the fact that it was once owned by a wealthy individual and 25 years ago it held a record. skarz (talk) 01:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree this yacht does not seem notable beyond any typical yacht of the ultra-wealthy. A single article in the NYT is not enough. Other reliable sources I have been able to find are passing mentions of the yacht's sale or a reference/basic description in articles about rich people/rich silicon valley ppl yachts.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 10:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • "Internet wizard sails Pounds 12m yacht from his desktop PC". The Sunday Times (London). 26 July 1998.(816 words)
  • "Look Buoys - No Hands". Sunday Mail (Queensland, Australia). 20 September 1998.(522 words)
  • "Webmaster steers virtual Mary Celeste". The Australian. 18 August 1998.(847 words)
  • "In the pursuit of a Silicon wizard". The Gazette (Montreal, Quebec). 4 March 2000.(833 words)
This is significant in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources ----Pontificalibus 11:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per the General Notability Guideline a topic is indeed presumed notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. However the GNG clarifies that "significant coverage" means sources that address the subject directly and in detail, going beyond mere mentions. This implies that trivial mentions — brief references without substantial information — do not contribute to establishing a topic's notability. skarz (talk) 02:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All eight sources I posted discuss the subject directly in detail and are not trivial mentions.----Pontificalibus 05:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even if there is significant coverage WP:N itself states that this “creates only a presumption of an article.” WP:NNC repeats the point: “Notability alone does not guarantee a stand‑alone page.” WP:NOTACATALOG also addresses the fact that not every item in the universe needs to have its own article. The WP:NVEHICLES essay says: “Individual vehicles, other than large ships, will very seldom be notable.” WikiProject‑Ships discussions often merge routine pleasure craft into broader articles about their builder or class instead of giving each a page.​ skarz (talk) 21:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Athena (yacht)

[edit]
Athena (yacht) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The yacht lacks any notoriety whatsoever except for the fact that it was once owned by a wealthy individual. This article reads like a CarFax report. skarz (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 10:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Stations

[edit]

Transportation Proposed deletions

[edit]
[edit]

None at present

[edit]

None at present

[edit]

None at present

[edit]

None at present

[edit]

None at present

[edit]
This section is transcluded from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 28. (edit | history)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 9#First f Great Western

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Transportation&oldid=1286168295"